Limiting Union benefits As Well
The one thing conspicuously absent in almost all of the discussions these days in is an equally stringent call for rollbacks or significant changes in union contracts. At the heart of this entire mess are the high costs of production, and the single largest cost facing Detroit are its labor costs, direct and indirect, as well as short and long-term obligations. The fancy word for the latter is "Legacy Costs." Regardless of what you call it, no company can survive indefinitely if must constantly bank more and more of its meager earnings or profits to fund future obligations.
Sure, management is clearly at fault for giving in to what in hindsight were unreasonable demands, and now it's time for Peter to pay Paul, and that means reexamining the logic and soundness of every single "Legacy" benefit promised to workers in the past 20-25 years. If we don't do that, then indeed it is quite possible that this country could collapse into something most of us dare not even mention.
P.S. So that no one misunderstands my motivation in writing the above, let me make it perfectly clear that I am not anti-union. In fact, in my early days as a newspaper reporter I actually saw the need for a union were I worked and I proceeded to work to have the very first Newspaper Guild established in Northern Virginia. Nonetheless, abuse of power can indeed be a dangerous thing and there has been an abundance of abuse within the UAW!
Labels: anti-union, labor costs, labor unions, legacy costs

